Squibs and Discussion
ثبت نشده
چکیده
It is well known that in sluicing constructions wh-dependencies can cross certain projectionsthat are otherwise barriers to movement (Ross 1969, Chomsky 1972). This fact would follow under the assumption that the relevant barriers are somehow deactivated when phonologically deleted (‘‘island repair’ ’ ). The problem, however, is that another form of phonologicaldeletion (VP-ellipsis;VPE) seems to be impossible in certain contexts where sluicing allows for island repair (Chung, Ladusaw, and McCloskey 1995, Merchant 2001). Nevertheless, we argue against the conclusion that island repair is a special propertyof sluicing.The argument is based on two observations. First, the difference between sluicing and VPE seems too broad to warrant the conclusion that island repair is the distinguishing factor (Lasnik 2001). Second, the conclusion is directly refuted by other VPE environments where island repair is possible (Kennedy and Merchant 2000; Fox, in preparation).The argument leaves us with a puzzle that we attempt to resolve while still maintaining the null hypothesis that VPE and sluicing involve the same operation of deletion, differing only in the size of the deleted constituent. Our proposed resolution capitalizes on a special property of the relevant sluicing contexts—namely, the presence of an indefinite NP in the antecedent clause in a position parallel to that of a trace in the elided clause. We argue that given the parallelismconditionson ellipsis, this fact prevents the wh-phrase in the elided clause from undergoing successive-cyclic movement. The remainingoption (one-fell-swoopmovement) requires the deletion of all barriers, including those that would otherwise be circumvented via an intermediate landing site. Such deletion occurs in sluicing but not in VPE, which targets a smaller constituent.
منابع مشابه
Squibs and Discussion 1 Introduction
The contrast in the semantics of Turkish object NPs with and without overt case morphology has received some attention in the literature (see, e.g., Dede 1986, Knecht 1986, Tura 1986, Enç 1991). The NPs with overt case morphology in (1a) and (1b) yield specific readings, whereas the NPs without case morphology in (1c) and (1d) are nonspecific. In this squib, I will examine nonspecific objects a...
متن کاملSquibs: On Paraphrase and Coreference
Paraphrase extraction1 and coreference resolution have applications in Question Answering, Information Extraction, Machine Translation, and so forth. Paraphrase pairs might be coreferential, and coreference relations are sometimes paraphrases. The two overlap considerably (Hirst 1981), but their definitionsmake them significantly different in essence: Paraphrasing concerns meaning, whereas core...
متن کاملSquibs And Discussions - Evaluating Discourse And Dialogue Coding Schemes
Agreement statistics play an important role in the evaluation of coding schemes for discourse and dialogue. Unfortunately there is a lack of understanding regarding appropriate agreement measures and how their results should be interpreted. In this article we describe the role of agreement measures and argue that only chance-corrected measures that assume a common distribution of labels for all...
متن کاملSquibs and Discussions: Estimation of Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars
The assignment of probabilities to the productions of a context-free grammar may generate an improper distribution: the probability of all finite parse trees is less than one. The condition for proper assignment is rather subtle. Production probabilities can be estimated from parsed or unparsed sentences, and the question arises as to whether or not an estimated system is automatically proper. ...
متن کامل